Zartaar
  • Home
  • About
    • Founders and Editors
    • The Magazine's Content
  • Submit
    • Submission Guidelines
    • FAQs
  • The Magazine
    • Issue 01
  • the blog
    • submit to the blog
    • read the blog
    • THE WEEKLY
  • Contact
  • Home
  • About
    • Founders and Editors
    • The Magazine's Content
  • Submit
    • Submission Guidelines
    • FAQs
  • The Magazine
    • Issue 01
  • the blog
    • submit to the blog
    • read the blog
    • THE WEEKLY
  • Contact

Essay 6: Living on Alert
​​​


A Brief Note 

This essay is part of a series of essays about mental health under prolonged instability and war. While many examples come from Afghanistan, particularly the years between 2001 and 2021, the experiences described are not unique to any one place or people. They reflect what happens to the human mind when danger becomes ongoing, unpredictable, and unresolved.
 
These essays are not memoirs, though brief sections marked From Memory draw on personal experience.
 
This series is not a clinical guide. The language of psychology is used carefully, not to pathologize, but to give form to experiences that were often normalized, misunderstood, or endured without words.
 
Throughout the series, the word "we" appears often. Sometimes it refers to Afghans, sometimes civilians, and sometimes trauma survivors. The meaning shifts; take what fits, and leave what doesn’t.
 
You will come across references to trauma, grief, and coping. If you need to pause while reading, do. Come back when you’re ready.
 
This is a story about people who didn’t always get help or therapy, and still found ways to keep going.
 
This writing can’t speak for everyone. It’s just one voice among many.
 
If something here feels familiar, you’re not being diagnosed. You’re being recognized. If it helps you notice something, it has done its job. If it provokes reflection or sparks a conversation you have never had before, even better.
 
If you’d like more context, Essay 0 sits at the beginning of the series.

The Shape of Everyday Fear

Some dangers arrive with noise, and others seep in quietly. They take up more and more space around us until we forget what it felt like to breathe freely.

Fear in our cities did not come all at once; it condensed over time. Layer by layer, it settled into daily life until it filled the air, affected our footsteps, and changed how we moved through streets, rooms, and past one another.

It altered how we spoke, how long we held a gaze, and how quickly we looked away.
After a while, it stopped feeling like fear.
It just felt like life.


This wasn’t panic or chaos, not anymore. It was the familiar tightening of the air around us when a car slowed down too long on the street. The way voices dropped an octave in certain neighborhoods. The way we kept a distance as a military or police vehicle passed by, not because they were a threat, but because their presence nearby could alter the moment. It could invite an incident.

Sometimes the overall air in the streets told us something terrible had happened before the sirens even began.
We didn’t call this trauma; it had become routine.

This kind of routine did not affect only our schedules; it showed up in our posture as well. It showed up in shoulders held slightly higher, in breaths taken slightly shallower, and in attention leaning forward before the mind.

Slowly and without much notice, attention began to reorganize itself around that routine: what we noticed first, what we listened for, and what we tracked without thinking. 
​

We learned to register small shifts, to listen more closely, and to read moments before anything actually happened.

We adapted, not because we chose to, but because adaptation became the only way to keep going. Lives were quietly rearranged around what could not be said out loud.

Readiness Without Rest

After the shock passes, the body is supposed to stand down, but sometimes it doesn’t.

Hypervigilance is what happens when the nervous system remains alert even when danger is no longer immediate. It is not panic or anxiety in the general sense.
It is a form of readiness without rest.


In places like Afghanistan, shaped by prolonged violence, this state became ordinary for many people.

We planned our days and lives around risk without thinking of it as fear. We thought about different routes, timings, exits, and locations without realizing.  

We thought of which streets to avoid, which buildings felt exposed, and which moments demanded silence. We didn’t explain why we crossed the road or why we suddenly sped up. It was as if everyone already understood.

It wasn’t panic, it was calculation.

This kind of alertness didn’t announce itself dramatically. It lived in small decisions, repeated endlessly. Where we walked, and where we nearly ran. How fast we drove near certain neighborhoods, crowds, or events. When we left the house, and when we stayed in the office longer.

It also lived in attention.

In the way our awareness leaned forward before the rest. In the way we listened for silence, because sometimes silence signaled danger more clearly than noise ever could. In the way the body registered shifts before the mind had words for them.

We lived under what might look like calm from the outside, while inside, everything stayed braced. This was not like panic that erupts and resolves, but a low, continuous readiness that rarely switched off.

This is what happens when stress does not resolve, but lingers; when the nervous system does not receive a clear signal that it is safe to stand down.

We didn’t relax or reset.
We adapted, until tension began to feel like our natural state.

From Memory: What If Their Aim Is Bad?

When my daughter was in primary school in Kabul, there was a morning when rockets were fired at the parliament building.

Her school went into an immediate lockdown. Parents were told not to come. One of my closest friends had children in the same school. We kept calling each other, trying to stay calm.

At one point, I said, “Try not to worry too much. They’re targeting the parliament, not the school.”

Without a hint of humor, she replied,
“I know. But these people don’t have proper training. What if they aim in the wrong direction?”

I burst out laughing, uncontrollably.

The timing. The grim logic. The accuracy. In that moment, it cut straight through the fear. And I still laugh when I remember it.

But what stayed with me just as much was the silence afterward, the way the laughter faded and something quieter settled in its place.

That sentence only makes sense if you’ve lived somewhere like Kabul. Humor didn’t mean the fear wasn’t real. It meant we needed a moment to breathe.

Often, laughter came first, and silence followed.

That was how we managed it, not by denying the danger, but by letting just enough pressure out to keep going.

And then we waited, alert again, even as we laughed.
Because nothing had actually changed.

When Alertness Becomes the Baseline

Under continuous threat, the nervous system adapts by staying prepared. It learns that danger can arrive without warning, and that quiet does not always mean safe.

This means that stress hormones such as adrenaline and cortisol circulate more frequently and for longer periods. They sharpen attention and speed reaction time. They keep muscles ready. At first, this can help keep people alive, but over time, the system may forget how to turn itself off.

As a result, for some of us, sleep grew light, and sounds felt sharper. Sudden movements triggered a startle response that felt disproportionate to the moment. Even calm carried a low hum of tension, as if something might happen any moment.

Sometimes days passed in this state, and the body did not fully stand down.


After a while, fear faded into the background.
It no longer felt like fear; it felt like a normal state.


When fear shapes our choices every day, it affects our minds and bodies. It doesn’t leave even when the sirens stop. It stays in the muscles, in breaths, and more.

This state of constant readiness is hypervigilance. It is a trauma response in which the mind and body remain braced for danger, even when none is immediately present.

The Invisible Work of Staying Ready

Hypervigilance is labor.

Our attention was always doing something: scanning rooms before we sat down, tracking who entered and exited, noticing shifts in tone or movement without consciously deciding to. Our bodies stayed a half-step ahead of the present, just in case.

That work came at a cost.

Some of us grew restless, others felt wired and exhausted at the same time. Many struggled to focus, forgot small things, or felt irritable without knowing why. It wasn’t uncommon to lose track of conversations, misplace objects, or feel overwhelmed by decisions that once felt simple. We were affected because our attention was constantly deployed elsewhere.

This wasn’t because we were anxious people.
It was because our nervous systems had learned, accurately, that anticipation was safer than surprise.


One of the most confusing aspects of hypervigilance is how normal it can appear. From the outside, we seemed composed, responsible, even calm. We worked and cared for others. We kept up routines, while inside, everything was braced.

Sometimes it looked like control, or caution, or an inability to fully relax, even when nothing was happening, but these weren’t personality traits. They were protective habits, built in response to environments that punished inattention.
​
In warzones, these traits are often praised. They are called common sense, maturity, and being prepared.

In Afghanistan, we did not call it trauma.

When Regulation Hardens

Most of these strategies worked for a while.

They helped us stay functional. They allowed life to continue under pressure, but regulation is meant to be flexible. When danger persists too long, everyday coping rituals begin to harden.

Checking turns into compulsion. Order turns into rigidity. Humor stops releasing tension and starts masking it. Control expands quietly, to cover more and more of life.
Not because people are weak, but because the nervous system was never given permission to stand down.


For many of us, fear became background noise. Silence felt more unsettling than sound. These were not overreactions.
They were adaptations to danger that never fully left.


Some of us noticed it in our bodies, in shoulders that never fully relaxed, in eyes that scanned rooms without conscious effort, and in startle responses that arrived without warning.

These were not flaws. They were signs that our bodies had stayed alert for too long.


This is what hypervigilance looks like when it stretches across years.
It does not mean we were broken. It means our nervous systems were trained to survive, not to rest.


Naming this does not turn it off, but it can help separate who we are from what our systems learned to do.

We can try to understand that some of the patterns we built in survival may have persisted longer than necessary. This does not mean they were wrong. It means they outlived the time they were designed for.

For now, some clarity may be enough.

Hypervigilance is not being dramatic, controlling, or unable to relax.

It is what happens when a nervous system learns that readiness matters more than ease. Much of what we carried was protection, shaped in a time when danger did not announce itself, and safety could not be assumed.

Noticing what was learned in survival and why may soften our confusion. It may loosen the grip of reactions that no longer belong to the present moment.

If parts of this essay stirred recognition, you may be noticing patterns of alertness.

Terms such as hypervigilance, chronic threat monitoring, and nervous system adaptation can describe how attention and readiness recalibrate in response to prolonged danger. They are not labels meant to confine, but rather language meant to clarify.

You may recognize a body that stays prepared.
A mind that scans before it settles.
Calm that never fully lands.

Or a memory that feels unreliable. Not because it is broken, but because attention was trained to stay elsewhere. The body learned that vigilance mattered more than recall.

This does not define our future. It just means our nervous system learned from a time that demanded vigilance. Hypervigilance does not immediately resolve because it is understood or confronted. The nervous system does not stand down on command.

It usually softens when it receives repeated signals that readiness is no longer required. When danger is consistently absent. When environments stop shifting without warning, and when nothing happens after the body loosens its grip.

This takes time, often longer than we expect, especially when vigilance was necessary for years.

What returns first is not peace, but flexibility; the ability to be alert when needed, and to rest when not.

By Sadia Fatimie

Find her on Instagram and Twitter (X).